<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More SHA in Erlang</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2009/01/03/more-sha-in-erlang/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2009/01/03/more-sha-in-erlang/</link>
	<description>Ask forgiveness, not permission.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:23:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Williamson</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2009/01/03/more-sha-in-erlang/comment-page-1/#comment-1346</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/?p=193#comment-1346</guid>
		<description>Thanks man, I was about to write a C driver because I was getting desperate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks man, I was about to write a C driver because I was getting desperate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2009/01/03/more-sha-in-erlang/comment-page-1/#comment-1316</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/?p=193#comment-1316</guid>
		<description>@Nicolas: no, I don&#039;t think performance would be all that great for a 50MB file. One of the test vectors is 393216 bytes, for example, and it takes 4.33s to run through SHA-256. Given that the performance appears to be fairly linear with respect to the input message size, I think it would take over 10 minutes to deal with a 50MB file.

Still, the performance is better than nothing, which is the support the crypto module currently gives us for these functions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nicolas: no, I don&#8217;t think performance would be all that great for a 50MB file. One of the test vectors is 393216 bytes, for example, and it takes 4.33s to run through SHA-256. Given that the performance appears to be fairly linear with respect to the input message size, I think it would take over 10 minutes to deal with a 50MB file.</p>
<p>Still, the performance is better than nothing, which is the support the crypto module currently gives us for these functions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2009/01/03/more-sha-in-erlang/comment-page-1/#comment-1315</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/?p=193#comment-1315</guid>
		<description>I wrote a SHA-1 library for Erlang in 2007, just to play with pattern matching:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://journal.batard.info/post/2007/07/19/erlang-sha-1-library&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://journal.batard.info/post/2007/07/19/erlang-sha-1-library&lt;/a&gt;

I am aware of crypto:sha/1, this was not meant to be used, but rather just a demo.

I&#039;m writing as the performance of my module was astoundingly bad; is yours better? Have you tried hashing even just a 50MB file?

Looking forward to hearing from you,

Nicolas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a SHA-1 library for Erlang in 2007, just to play with pattern matching:</p>
<p><a href="http://journal.batard.info/post/2007/07/19/erlang-sha-1-library" rel="nofollow">http://journal.batard.info/post/2007/07/19/erlang-sha-1-library</a></p>
<p>I am aware of crypto:sha/1, this was not meant to be used, but rather just a demo.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m writing as the performance of my module was astoundingly bad; is yours better? Have you tried hashing even just a 50MB file?</p>
<p>Looking forward to hearing from you,</p>
<p>Nicolas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2009/01/03/more-sha-in-erlang/comment-page-1/#comment-1312</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/?p=193#comment-1312</guid>
		<description>Thanks for keeping Erlang &quot;on the curve&quot; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for keeping Erlang &#8220;on the curve&#8221; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MononcQc</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2009/01/03/more-sha-in-erlang/comment-page-1/#comment-1307</link>
		<dc:creator>MononcQc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/?p=193#comment-1307</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot! I was definitely looking for a better sha module for erlang just this week and it seems this comes in right in time.

This will prove itself to be really useful, and if good enough, I hope it can eventually make it into the standard erlang library.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot! I was definitely looking for a better sha module for erlang just this week and it seems this comes in right in time.</p>
<p>This will prove itself to be really useful, and if good enough, I hope it can eventually make it into the standard erlang library.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.158 seconds -->
