<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Erlang: It&#8217;s About Reliability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/05/01/erlang-its-about-reliability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/05/01/erlang-its-about-reliability/</link>
	<description>Ask forgiveness, not permission.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/05/01/erlang-its-about-reliability/#comment-891</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/?p=66#comment-891</guid>
		<description>BTW, &lt;a href="http://www.erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2003-April/008647.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here is a great email from Joe Armstrong&lt;/a&gt; discussing some of the thinking behind how Erlang approaches the handling of failures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, <a href="http://www.erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2003-April/008647.html" rel="nofollow">here is a great email from Joe Armstrong</a> discussing some of the thinking behind how Erlang approaches the handling of failures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/05/01/erlang-its-about-reliability/#comment-883</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 05:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/?p=66#comment-883</guid>
		<description>16: If Twitter is using Erlang, it's certainly a very bad example, considering the number of spectacular crashes and day long downtimes they have experienced these past few months.

More seriously, no, they don't use Erlang, and they have moved away from Ruby on Rails (the article on Techcrunch is actually behind:  they started moving away from RoR months ago).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>16: If Twitter is using Erlang, it&#8217;s certainly a very bad example, considering the number of spectacular crashes and day long downtimes they have experienced these past few months.</p>
<p>More seriously, no, they don&#8217;t use Erlang, and they have moved away from Ruby on Rails (the article on Techcrunch is actually behind:  they started moving away from RoR months ago).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dionysius</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/05/01/erlang-its-about-reliability/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>Dionysius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 16:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/?p=66#comment-875</guid>
		<description>Isn't Twitter using Erlang for their high-transaction component and Ruby for the rest?

You can hack just about any language to do just about anything, but the syntax of the language shapes how you think about programming. I see this as the great strength of Erlang: it teaches programmers to think about concurrency and parallelism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t Twitter using Erlang for their high-transaction component and Ruby for the rest?</p>
<p>You can hack just about any language to do just about anything, but the syntax of the language shapes how you think about programming. I see this as the great strength of Erlang: it teaches programmers to think about concurrency and parallelism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My daily readings 05/02/2008 &#171; Strange Kite</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/05/01/erlang-its-about-reliability/#comment-869</link>
		<dc:creator>My daily readings 05/02/2008 &#171; Strange Kite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 11:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/?p=66#comment-869</guid>
		<description>[...] Erlang: It’s About Reliability :: Steve Vinoski’s Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Erlang: It’s About Reliability :: Steve Vinoski’s Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EwanSilver.com &#187; Reliability</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/05/01/erlang-its-about-reliability/#comment-868</link>
		<dc:creator>EwanSilver.com &#187; Reliability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 10:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/?p=66#comment-868</guid>
		<description>[...] Vinoski talking about reliability (in particular my favourite: Erlang) To achieve reliability, you have to accept [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vinoski talking about reliability (in particular my favourite: Erlang) To achieve reliability, you have to accept [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
