<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wiger on Erlang-style Concurrency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/02/07/wiger-on-erlang-style-concurrency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/02/07/wiger-on-erlang-style-concurrency/</link>
	<description>Ask forgiveness, not permission.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:23:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Logan</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/02/07/wiger-on-erlang-style-concurrency/comment-page-1/#comment-653</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Logan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/02/07/wiger-on-erlang-style-concurrency/#comment-653</guid>
		<description>&quot;it’s [sic] be interesting to see how Steve mix [sic] Erlang and HTTP, since Erlang is asynchronous in nature and does not have any “resource” concept and HTTP’s sweet spots are just the opposite&quot;

Oh, dear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it’s [sic] be interesting to see how Steve mix [sic] Erlang and HTTP, since Erlang is asynchronous in nature and does not have any “resource” concept and HTTP’s sweet spots are just the opposite&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, dear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeD</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/02/07/wiger-on-erlang-style-concurrency/comment-page-1/#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/02/07/wiger-on-erlang-style-concurrency/#comment-651</guid>
		<description>Ah, how I wish I had the time to build an HTTP based messaging system with Erlang. Sort of like XMPP but without angle brackets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, how I wish I had the time to build an HTTP based messaging system with Erlang. Sort of like XMPP but without angle brackets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Tarlano</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/02/07/wiger-on-erlang-style-concurrency/comment-page-1/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Tarlano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/02/07/wiger-on-erlang-style-concurrency/#comment-650</guid>
		<description>Inevitably all good concurrent applications handle partial ordering of execution in some coordinated fashion. 

Last year I took a 6 month dive into Erlang. I found it a very pleasant experience and its functional style really turned me on. 

It wasn&#039;t my first CO/COPL language, since I had used Limbo (from Inferno) and Occam in the past. 

Erlang was however the first that put forth, front and center, the notion of explicitly designing using a supervisor model and hierarchies of supervision trees for coordination. This is a real gem that Erlang brings to the table and speaks to me as a key architecture abstraction for coordination. 

Recently, I have been diving into the &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1376887&amp;SiteID=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Concurrency and Coordination Runtime (CCR) &lt;/a&gt; from the MSRS folks over at Microsoft. I recommend giving it a look if you can grab a couple minutes since it brings something very nice to .NET ;)

Tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inevitably all good concurrent applications handle partial ordering of execution in some coordinated fashion. </p>
<p>Last year I took a 6 month dive into Erlang. I found it a very pleasant experience and its functional style really turned me on. </p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t my first CO/COPL language, since I had used Limbo (from Inferno) and Occam in the past. </p>
<p>Erlang was however the first that put forth, front and center, the notion of explicitly designing using a supervisor model and hierarchies of supervision trees for coordination. This is a real gem that Erlang brings to the table and speaks to me as a key architecture abstraction for coordination. </p>
<p>Recently, I have been diving into the <a href="http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1376887&amp;SiteID=1" rel="nofollow"> Concurrency and Coordination Runtime (CCR) </a> from the MSRS folks over at Microsoft. I recommend giving it a look if you can grab a couple minutes since it brings something very nice to .NET ;)</p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.159 seconds -->
