<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Static Languages: Rationalizations and Myths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/02/05/static-languages-rationalizations-and-myths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/02/05/static-languages-rationalizations-and-myths/</link>
	<description>Ask forgiveness, not permission.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yaws &#171; No sé cómo llamar a este blog</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/02/05/static-languages-rationalizations-and-myths/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaws &#171; No sé cómo llamar a este blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/02/05/static-languages-rationalizations-and-myths/#comment-767</guid>
		<description>[...] me ha llevado a este artículo, que es realmente interesante de por sí. Pero la cuestión es que me ha hecho saber sobre Yaws, un [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] me ha llevado a este artículo, que es realmente interesante de por sí. Pero la cuestión es que me ha hecho saber sobre Yaws, un [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Davies</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/02/05/static-languages-rationalizations-and-myths/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/02/05/static-languages-rationalizations-and-myths/#comment-692</guid>
		<description>@Mark Snyder -- I completely agree with your 3 points, EXCEPT that "static typing really encumbers development during the prototyping phase, when the shape of key abstractions is in flux". For me, static typing is especially valuable when things are changing fast, and I want to have my key abstractions as explicit structures, not buckets of random name/value pairs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark Snyder &#8212; I completely agree with your 3 points, EXCEPT that &#8220;static typing really encumbers development during the prototyping phase, when the shape of key abstractions is in flux&#8221;. For me, static typing is especially valuable when things are changing fast, and I want to have my key abstractions as explicit structures, not buckets of random name/value pairs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Ewald</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/02/05/static-languages-rationalizations-and-myths/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Ewald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/02/05/static-languages-rationalizations-and-myths/#comment-667</guid>
		<description>Steve,

I loved this post. I've been using Ruby quite a bit lately and I've been blown away by how productive it is. I hear a lot of skepticism from some, especially about the issue of scaling to a large project or team. I haven't done it yet, so I can't say whether it works or not. But given the productivity boost, it has got to be worth going down the path to see. Hopefully I'll be able to report on that soon - my team is about to rebuild our site with Rails (moving from ASP.NET).

Tim-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>I loved this post. I&#8217;ve been using Ruby quite a bit lately and I&#8217;ve been blown away by how productive it is. I hear a lot of skepticism from some, especially about the issue of scaling to a large project or team. I haven&#8217;t done it yet, so I can&#8217;t say whether it works or not. But given the productivity boost, it has got to be worth going down the path to see. Hopefully I&#8217;ll be able to report on that soon - my team is about to rebuild our site with Rails (moving from ASP.NET).</p>
<p>Tim-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chorny</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/02/05/static-languages-rationalizations-and-myths/#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>chorny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 21:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/02/05/static-languages-rationalizations-and-myths/#comment-658</guid>
		<description>You can have typesafety in Perl (for basic types requires module from CPAN, for classes - integrated in Perl itself).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can have typesafety in Perl (for basic types requires module from CPAN, for classes - integrated in Perl itself).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Logan</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/02/05/static-languages-rationalizations-and-myths/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Logan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/02/05/static-languages-rationalizations-and-myths/#comment-652</guid>
		<description>Wow. I've been flat out fighting the flu for seven days, and  come back to this. I'm sick to my stomach all over again.

Bill Burke seems a troll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I&#8217;ve been flat out fighting the flu for seven days, and  come back to this. I&#8217;m sick to my stomach all over again.</p>
<p>Bill Burke seems a troll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
