<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Answers for Sergey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/11/17/answers-for-sergey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/11/17/answers-for-sergey/</link>
	<description>Ask forgiveness, not permission.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 14:32:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: REST vs. WS-* &#8230; Does it help me to achieve my goal? &#171; Zettelkasten</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/11/17/answers-for-sergey/comment-page-1/#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator>REST vs. WS-* &#8230; Does it help me to achieve my goal? &#171; Zettelkasten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/11/17/answers-for-sergey/#comment-789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of the REST approach consider using HTTP as a mere transport as abusive (e.g. Tilkov, Vinovsky). For me, using a word like &#8220;abuse&#8221; sounds like putting HTTP on a throne. You have to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the REST approach consider using HTTP as a mere transport as abusive (e.g. Tilkov, Vinovsky). For me, using a word like &#8220;abuse&#8221; sounds like putting HTTP on a throne. You have to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Service-Oriented Architecture mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/11/17/answers-for-sergey/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>Service-Oriented Architecture mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/11/17/answers-for-sergey/#comment-343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] are now wondering out loud if this is the way things are heading. James Snell, Dare Obasanjo, Steve Vinoski, and Sergey Beryozkin (and several others) have been engaged in a running online debate about the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are now wondering out loud if this is the way things are heading. James Snell, Dare Obasanjo, Steve Vinoski, and Sergey Beryozkin (and several others) have been engaged in a running online debate about the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Sandoz</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/11/17/answers-for-sergey/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Sandoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/11/17/answers-for-sergey/#comment-289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding your answer to question #2: &quot;If code generation is acceptable, would you welcome WADL? If yes, what to do with generated client types with respect to the change management ?&quot;

WADL can be useful to document services:

http://www.mnot.net/blog/2005/05/18/WADL

WADL can represent meta-data, as hypermedia, of a resource that is lacking when using the &#039;raw&#039; HTTP OPTIONS method.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding your answer to question #2: &#8220;If code generation is acceptable, would you welcome WADL? If yes, what to do with generated client types with respect to the change management ?&#8221;</p>
<p>WADL can be useful to document services:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mnot.net/blog/2005/05/18/WADL" rel="nofollow">http://www.mnot.net/blog/2005/05/18/WADL</a></p>
<p>WADL can represent meta-data, as hypermedia, of a resource that is lacking when using the &#8216;raw&#8217; HTTP OPTIONS method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dare Obasanjo aka Carnage4Life - What's Right and Wrong with Code Generation in Web Services</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/11/17/answers-for-sergey/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Dare Obasanjo aka Carnage4Life - What's Right and Wrong with Code Generation in Web Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/11/17/answers-for-sergey/#comment-288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Steve Vinoski&#039;s Answers for Sergey I stumbled upon Sergey Beryozkin&#039;s Questions for Steve&#160;which started of with the following [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steve Vinoski&#8217;s Answers for Sergey I stumbled upon Sergey Beryozkin&#8217;s Questions for Steve&nbsp;which started of with the following [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Lacey</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/11/17/answers-for-sergey/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Lacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/11/17/answers-for-sergey/#comment-287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding question #4: &quot;Would you expect in the future even software modules interacting with each other through a common generic interfaces?&quot;  

You might want to take a look at NetKernel (http://1060.org/).  I haven&#039;t used it personally, but the 1060 folks gave me a briefing.  And from what they told me, long ago they independently derived the RESTful principles of the Web (uniform interdace, caching, etc.) and boiled them down into the innards of a single application server.  From perusing their mailing lists, however, it seems they haven&#039;t fully embraced HTTP.  Presumably, that&#039;ll be in some future release.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding question #4: &#8220;Would you expect in the future even software modules interacting with each other through a common generic interfaces?&#8221;  </p>
<p>You might want to take a look at NetKernel (<a href="http://1060.org/" rel="nofollow">http://1060.org/</a>).  I haven&#8217;t used it personally, but the 1060 folks gave me a briefing.  And from what they told me, long ago they independently derived the RESTful principles of the Web (uniform interdace, caching, etc.) and boiled them down into the innards of a single application server.  From perusing their mailing lists, however, it seems they haven&#8217;t fully embraced HTTP.  Presumably, that&#8217;ll be in some future release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
