<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The ESB Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/10/04/the-esb-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/10/04/the-esb-question/</link>
	<description>Ask forgiveness, not permission.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Johnny G</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/10/04/the-esb-question/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/10/04/the-esb-question/#comment-723</guid>
		<description>Sonic Software
BEA
IBM
IONA
TIBCO
webMethods
Cape Clear
Fiorano
Oracle
Software AG
Neudesic

Didn't many of these companies also rally behind Java EJB's and RMI?  Of course there is no way they could have been wrong about that one either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonic Software<br />
BEA<br />
IBM<br />
IONA<br />
TIBCO<br />
webMethods<br />
Cape Clear<br />
Fiorano<br />
Oracle<br />
Software AG<br />
Neudesic</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t many of these companies also rally behind Java EJB&#8217;s and RMI?  Of course there is no way they could have been wrong about that one either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Fremantle</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/10/04/the-esb-question/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fremantle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/10/04/the-esb-question/#comment-376</guid>
		<description>I've recently written an article which responds in some ways to your blog entry. Its entitled "Reclaiming the ESB". You can read it here: http://wso2.org/library/2913 

Paul Fremantle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently written an article which responds in some ways to your blog entry. Its entitled &#8220;Reclaiming the ESB&#8221;. You can read it here: <a href="http://wso2.org/library/2913" rel="nofollow">http://wso2.org/library/2913</a> </p>
<p>Paul Fremantle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jumping Through Hoops &#8211; REST links</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/10/04/the-esb-question/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Jumping Through Hoops &#8211; REST links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/10/04/the-esb-question/#comment-364</guid>
		<description>[...] Vinoski – The ESB Question includes a great quote: Frankly, if I were an enterprise architect today, and I were genuinely [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vinoski – The ESB Question includes a great quote: Frankly, if I were an enterprise architect today, and I were genuinely [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chui Tey</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/10/04/the-esb-question/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Chui Tey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 00:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/10/04/the-esb-question/#comment-255</guid>
		<description>I've written enough hastily put together integration scripts to observe that most of the code added later were for runtime monitoring and debugging support - start, stop, pause, logging, reestablishing database connections. 

Dynamic languages hold some promise, but more important is a runtime which makes it easy to debug. Shouldn't ESBs be more like VMs which make it easy to inspect and debug?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve written enough hastily put together integration scripts to observe that most of the code added later were for runtime monitoring and debugging support - start, stop, pause, logging, reestablishing database connections. </p>
<p>Dynamic languages hold some promise, but more important is a runtime which makes it easy to debug. Shouldn&#8217;t ESBs be more like VMs which make it easy to inspect and debug?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dilip Ranganathan</title>
		<link>http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/10/04/the-esb-question/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Dilip Ranganathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 02:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/10/04/the-esb-question/#comment-171</guid>
		<description>Steve

I meant a feed for all comments across all entries.  Like the way Sam Ruby has it today.  That way I wouldn't have missed your reply to my request for comment feed :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve</p>
<p>I meant a feed for all comments across all entries.  Like the way Sam Ruby has it today.  That way I wouldn&#8217;t have missed your reply to my request for comment feed :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
