Comments on: Tim Bray and Erlang http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/09/23/tim-bray-and-erlang/ Ask forgiveness, not permission. Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:09:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: JavaSPEKTRUM Blogosphäre » Blog Archiv » Blogosphäre (aus JavaSPEKTRUM 06/07) http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/09/23/tim-bray-and-erlang/comment-page-1/#comment-134 JavaSPEKTRUM Blogosphäre » Blog Archiv » Blogosphäre (aus JavaSPEKTRUM 06/07) Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:16:10 +0000 http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/09/23/tim-bray-and-erlang/#comment-134 [...] liefert eine Implementierung in C++, Microsoft-Guru und SOAP-Vater Don Box kontert mit C#. Die erste Erlang-Lösung von CORBA-Guru Steve Vinoski funktioniert am besten mit 2400 (!) Erlang-Prozessen, liest allerdings [...] [...] liefert eine Implementierung in C++, Microsoft-Guru und SOAP-Vater Don Box kontert mit C#. Die erste Erlang-Lösung von CORBA-Guru Steve Vinoski funktioniert am besten mit 2400 (!) Erlang-Prozessen, liest allerdings [...]

]]> By: Bill Burke http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/09/23/tim-bray-and-erlang/comment-page-1/#comment-17 Bill Burke Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:40:47 +0000 http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/09/23/tim-bray-and-erlang/#comment-17 Thank you Doug Lea for keeping Java <a href="http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/jsr166/dist/jsr166ydocs/jsr166y/forkjoin/package-summary.html#package_description" rel="nofollow">relevant</a>, but still boring ;-) Thank you Doug Lea for keeping Java relevant, but still boring ;-)

]]> By: Pete Kirkham http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/09/23/tim-bray-and-erlang/comment-page-1/#comment-15 Pete Kirkham Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:54:59 +0000 http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/09/23/tim-bray-and-erlang/#comment-15 Ahh, worked that's the [^ .] at the end of the regex. Sorry for being a bit dense - first time trying to read erlang, and assumed from perl it $. was a variable not a character. Ahh, worked that’s the [^ .] at the end of the regex. Sorry for being a bit dense – first time trying to read erlang, and assumed from perl it $. was a variable not a character.

]]> By: steve http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/09/23/tim-bray-and-erlang/comment-page-1/#comment-14 steve Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:48:39 +0000 http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/09/23/tim-bray-and-erlang/#comment-14 Hi Pete, that find_match code came directly from Tim's original code at <http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2007/09/22/Erlang>. See his process_match function. Hi Pete, that find_match code came directly from Tim’s original code at . See his process_match function.

]]> By: Pete Kirkham http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/09/23/tim-bray-and-erlang/comment-page-1/#comment-13 Pete Kirkham Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:36:20 +0000 http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2007/09/23/tim-bray-and-erlang/#comment-13 Sorry, I thought it was performing a similar function to the other code people had posted - either just counting matches, or counting occurances of each URL request as per the original code. case lists:member($., Last) of false -> 1; true -> 0 end; so you're only counting unique URLs, and not reporting on the number of requests to the most popular URLs? Sorry, I thought it was performing a similar function to the other code people had posted – either just counting matches, or counting occurances of each URL request as per the original code.

case lists:member($., Last) of
false -> 1;
true -> 0
end;

so you’re only counting unique URLs, and not reporting on the number of requests to the most popular URLs?

]]>